#10 of 13, up from #11 · Kimi
Moonshot
Up 0.5 since 18 Oct, slipping over 30 days (Direction ▼ 1.0).
Follow to mark Moonshot's stories across the site and see only your labs on the Wire. No account needed.
Strongest onEcosystem4thCapability5th
Lags onRelease execution13thTrust, safety and privacy11thValue10th
Score51.0▲ 0.5 since 18 Oct
Strength51.1Eight pillars
Direction▼ 1.0Last 30 days
Confidence
Score over time
ScoreStrength
ScoreStrength
57 daily closes, the earlier ones reconstructed. Download CSV
The eight pillars
Each pillar 0 to 100 on fixed goalposts, with its rank among the 13 ranked labs. The tick marks the median lab; points are what the pillar adds to Strength.
Why Moonshot is #10
Most of its Strength comes from Capability and Reliability. Points are contributions to the Score.
- Behind Mistral by 4.8 points. Biggest differences: Trust, safety and privacy −3.6, Release execution −2.5, Capability +2.2; Direction −1.4.
- Ahead of Tencent by 0.4 points, within the day-to-day noise. Biggest differences: Ecosystem +4.8, Value −2.4, Release execution −2.3; Direction −0.7.
With every pillar weight moved up to 50% either way, it ranks 10 to 11 in 90% of recalculations; with equal weights, #10.
Since 18 Oct
Score up 0.5 (50.5 to 51.0), rank 11 to 10. Reception +0.8, Direction −0.2.
What was measuredAll 25 readings behind this close, with source, date and goalposts
Filled: no fresh reading, so the ranked labs' median was used. Carried: a source that keeps no history, read later.
| Indicator | Reading | Scaled | Goalposts | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arena text rating Arena (arena.ai) text leaderboard: rating of the lab's best model with 1,000 votes or more | 1488.1 kimi-k3-max | 79 | 1250 to 1550 rating | 13 Oct |
| Benchmarks Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub: the lab's best score on each of GPQA Diamond, FrontierMath tiers 1 to 3, SWE-bench Verified and OTIS Mock AIME, each placed between fixed goalposts, averaged; runs from the last 365 days, at least 3 of the 4 | 80.3 GPQA diamond 93.1% (Kimi K3 (max)); FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private 72.2% (Kimi K3 (max)); SWE-Bench verified 76.7% (Kimi K2.6); OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 97.2% (Kimi K3 (max)) | 80 | already 0 to 100 | 19 Oct |
| Paid adoption Published spend and paid-use evidence, latest edition of each: Ramp AI Index (share of US businesses paying the vendor, monthly), Menlo Ventures (enterprise API spend share), a16z CIO survey (share of LLM wallet), ICONIQ (share of AI builders using the provider), each placed on its own scale and averaged by weight; facts and sources at /data/adoption.json | 1.2 Menlo Ventures, State of Generative AI in the Enterprise (2025-12): not named, below its threshold; a16z enterprise CIO survey (2026-01): not named, below its threshold; ICONIQ, State of AI 2026: The Builder's Economy (2026-07): 4% | 1 | already 0 to 100 | 19 Oct |
| Assistant users Users of the lab's assistants (chat apps and coding agents) as the lab or its parent last disclosed them, or a panel measurement (QuestMobile) where a lab discloses none; weekly figures count as monthly (a lower bound); dated by disclosure, and only disclosures from the last 12 months count; not applicable to a lab with no figure; facts and sources at /data/assistants.json | 8338000 Kimi app: Q1 monthly active users 8.338 million (QuestMobile with NBD, 2026-04-21, third-party measurement) | 28 | 1 million to 2 billion monthly users | 19 Oct |
| Web traffic Cloudflare Radar: the lab's best rank among the top 20 generative-AI services by traffic, 21 minus the rank | 0 not in the top 20 generative-AI services | 0 | 0 to 20 rank points | 19 Oct |
| API spend share OpenRouter rankings: the lab's share of all dollars spent on OpenRouter in the last 30 days, across every model (not token volume, which cheap bulk models dominate) | 5.0881 5.1% of $104.4M spent on OpenRouter in 30 days (8 models) | 38 | 0% to 35% of spend | 11 Oct |
| App charts App Store top free charts in 7 countries | 0 not in the top 100 | 0 | 0 to 100 chart points | 19 Oct |
| Coding agent downloads npm and PyPI downloads of the lab's official coding agents (such as Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Qwen Code, Mistral Vibe), last 30 days; not applicable to a lab with none; standalone IDEs without public counts (such as Antigravity) are not seen | 50722 pypi:kimi-cli 50722 | 18 | 10 thousand to 100 million a month | 19 Oct |
| Coding extension installs VS Code Marketplace: installs of the lab's official coding extensions; not applicable to a lab with none | 608386 moonshot-ai.kimi-code 608386 | 29 | 100 thousand to 50 million installs | 19 Oct |
| SDK downloads PyPI and npm downloads of the official SDKs, last 30 days | Not applicable | 100 thousand to 1 billion a month | ||
| Open-model downloads Hugging Face downloads of the lab's models, last 30 days | 2736922 moonshotai | 49 | 10 thousand to 1 billion a month | 19 Oct |
| Shipping cadence Vikshy Wire: confirmed launches and updates of materiality 2 or more, last 90 days | 1 1 confirmed launches and updates in 90 days | 18 | 0 to 30 in 90 days | 19 Oct |
| Biggest launch Vikshy Wire: the biggest launch in the last 90 days, fading with age | 1.66 | 33 | materiality 0 to 5 | 19 Oct |
| Rating per dollar Arena rating of the lab's best-value model, less 30 points for each doubling of its blended list price (3 parts input to 1 part output), with prices below $0.30 per million counted as $0.30 | 1442.2 kimi-k2.5-thinking: 1450 at $1.20/M blended | 48 | 1250 to 1650 points | 13 Oct |
| Cloud availability Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud and Microsoft Foundry: whether each offers the lab's current models as a managed, pay-per-use API (the flagship or the model one step behind it counts 1, an older generation only 0.5, open-weight side lines 0), dated by availability; facts and sources at /data/distribution.json | 2.5 Amazon Bedrock: Kimi K3 (GA 18 Sep 2026), K2.5; Google Cloud: Kimi K2 Thinking only (deprecated, retiring 21 Oct 2026) (older generation, half); Microsoft Foundry: Kimi K2.5 to K2.7 sold by Azure; K3 via Fireworks on Foundry | 83 | 0 to 3 platforms | 19 Oct |
| Open-weight hosts OpenRouter: distinct providers serving the lab's open-weight models; not applicable to a lab that publishes none (a closed model's reach is its cloud availability) | 33 InferenceNet, Wafer, Morph, Relace, Sail Research, AkashML, Makora, Decart, Chutes, Phala, DigitalOcean, DeepInfra | 85 | 1 to 60 providers | 19 Oct |
| Developer interest Hugging Face likes on the lab's models | 26683 moonshotai | 57 | 1 thousand to 316 thousand likes | 19 Oct |
| Hacker News Hacker News points on stories about the lab, last 30 days | 24 1 stories; top: Hyper Optimizing Kimi K3 in vLLM (24) | 31 | 0 to 30,000 points | 19 Oct |
| Press and analysts Vikshy Wire: press and analyst pieces on the lab's developments, last 30 days | 0 | 0 | 0 to 60 pieces | 19 Oct |
| Official API uptime The lab's own status page: 30-day uptime of the components that make up its model API, counting major outages in full and partial outages at 30%, the pages' own formula (degraded performance is not counted); labs label outages differently, so a measured cross-check sits beside it | 99.9815 status.moonshot.cn, Open API and API Service: 99.981% over 30 days (0.1 h major, 0.0 h partial outage) | 98 | 99% to 100% over 30 days | 19 Oct |
| Measured uptime OpenRouter: the median uptime of the lab's own API endpoints, an independent cross-check of the status page, the mean of daily readings over 30 days | 99.9317 mean of 30 daily readings, 2026-09-20 to 2026-10-19 | 99 | 90% to 100% | 19 Oct |
| Independent assessments Independent assessments published by then, each put on 0 to 100: the Future of Life Institute AI Safety Index (40%), the Stanford Foundation Model Transparency Index (30%) and the SaferAI risk-management ratings (30%), averaged over those that cover the lab; a lab none covers is not independently assessed, and filled with the median like any gap | Not independently assessed: none of the assessments covers this lab: filled with the median | 22 | 0 to 100 | |
| Customer data commitments From the lab's own documentation: API and business data not used for training by default; a zero-data-retention option; a choice of data region | 0 none of the three commitments found | 0 | 0 to 3 commitments | 19 Oct |
| Security certifications From the lab's trust center: SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001 (AI management) covering its model API | 0 none of SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001 found | 0 | 0 to 3 certifications | 19 Oct |
| Security and privacy incidents Security breaches, data leaks and regulatory privacy actions (bans, fines, orders) affecting the lab's AI services or caused by its AI systems in the last 12 months, from reputable reporting and regulators, counted once per public disclosure, and half when the lab itself disclosed harm from its AI with no legal duty to; every fact, and what was not counted and why, is at /data/trust.json | 0 no security or privacy incident or regulatory action found in 12 months | 100 | 0 to 3 in 12 months, fewer is better | 19 Oct |
Direction
No confirmed development of materiality 2 or more in 30 days: minus 1 for going quiet.
Latest from Moonshot
What Moonshot shipped, broke and changed lately. The full Moonshot timeline, with every model it has released.
- 18 SepKimi K3 from Moonshot AI arrives on Amazon BedrockFeatures · New product or feature
